Sulochana v. State By, Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12-09-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL.O.P.No.24863 of 2025 Sulochana Petitioner Vs State By, Inspector of Police, Thiruvallam Police Station, Vellore District.
Respondent Crime No.122 of 2025.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Thirumoorthy For Respondent : Mr.S.Udhayakumar Government Advocate(Crl.Side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 296(b) and 109 of BNSS Act, 2023 (294 and 307 IPC), in Crime No.122 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of prosecution is that the petitioner's husband was in illicit relationship with the defacto complainant and the same was questioned by the 1/4
petitioner and there was a fight between the injured and the petitioner. Hence, the case.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for respondent would submit that there was injury and the injured discharged from hospital. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the nature of the complaint, the injured discharged from the hospital and custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Magistrate, Katpadi, on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of 2/4
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties, in which one surety must be a blood surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that: [a] if the petitioners fail to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled;
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation;
[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
3/4
T.V.THAMILSELVI , J.
kmm [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
12.09.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No kmm To
1. The learned Magistrate, Katpadi.
2. The Inspector of Police, Thiruvallam Police Station, Vellore District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
CRL.O.P.No.24863 of 2025 4/4