P.Manikandan @ Pallu Mani v. The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 13.12.2022 CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI P.Manikandan @ Pallu Mani, S/o. Perumal.
...
Petitioner Vs.
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, T-12 Poonamallee Police Station, (Crime No.710 of 2022) ...
Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.710 of 2022 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Jagatharachagan For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/6
O R D E R
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.11.2022 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 307, 323 of I.P.C. in Crime No.710 of 2022, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence, due to previous enmity, the petitioner along with other accused waylaid the defacto complainant, and assaulted him with knife, thereby he sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for petitioner would submit that he is an innocent person and he is no way connected with the occurrence between the groups. He would submit that has been falsely implicated in the present case. He would submit that now the injured also discharged from the hospital and he is in custody for more than 39 days from 03.11.2022. Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner. 2/6
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that on the date of occurrence, there is a wordy quarrel between two groups, in which, the petitioner along with other accused said to have attacked the defacto complainant and got injured. He would submit that the injured was discharged from the hospital and the investigation is almost completed. He would submit that if he is released on bail, he would hamper the investigation and tamper the witnesses. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the fact that the injured discharged from the hospital, and the investigation is almost completed and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Poonamallee and on further 3/6
conditions that:
(a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b) the petitioner shall stay at Cuddalore and report before the Town Police Station, Cuddalore daily at 10.30 a.m. for the period of one month ;
(c) the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature;
(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner 4/6
released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
(g) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
13.12.2022 rpp To 1.The Judicial Magistrate-II, Poonamallee.
2.The Inspector of Police, T-12 Poonamallee Police Station.
3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.
5/6
T.V.THAMILSELVI , J.
rpp 13.12.2022 6/6