D.Rangasamy v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.12.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN Crl.O.P.No.30798 of 2022 D.Rangasamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.

2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Malliyakarai Police Station, Salem District.

3. N.RamaGovindhan ...

Respondents PRAYER : This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in connection with Crime No.Not Knwon of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police in the name of investigation.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajakumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate(Crl.side) 1/6

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents police not to harass the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been unnecessarily harassing the petitioner on the basis of the complaint given by one Alamelu.

3. In reply, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by one Alamelu, FIR was registered in Crime No.50 of 2022, in which, the petitioner is not a named accused. However, he is the owner of the tractor, which was used for damaging the property..

4. It is seen that the petitioner is not a named accused. However, this Court directs the petitioner to co-operate with the investigation

5. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent police has been 2/6

harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. 6.

In the present case in hand, the petitioner has complained of harassment by the police based on a complaint and seek for this Court's intervention by way of a direction. The term 'harassment' by itself has a very wide meaning and hence, what could be harassment to the petitioner may not be the same to the police officer.

7.

In order to circumvent such situations, the following guidelines are issued:

a)While summoning any person named in the complaint or any witness to the incident complained of, the police officer shall summon such person through a written summon under Section 160 Cr.P.C., specifying a particular date and time for appearing before them for such an enquiry/investigation. b) The respondent police is directed to serve summons mentioning the CSR number, date of complaint and the name of the complainant 3/6

c)The minutes of the enquiry shall be recorded in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the police station.

d)The police officer shall refrain himself or herself from harassing persons called upon for enquiry/investigation. e)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhered to. 8.

With the above observations and direction, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.

14.12.2022 Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order Sma To 1.The Superintendent of Police, 4/6

Salem District.

2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Malliyakarai Police Station, Salem District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

5/6

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J.

Sma Crl.O.P.No.30798 of 2022 14.12.2022 6/6