S.M. Krishnan v. Ramar @ Raman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.12.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMIL SELVI CRP.Nos.4441 & 4445 of 2023 S.M.Krishnan ... Petitioner in both CRPs.

Vs.

1. Ramar @ Raman

2. Manickam

3. Allimuthu

4. Anbuselvan

5. Pachiannan

6. Jaganathan

7. Balakrishnan

8. Nagammal

9. Muthulakshmi

10. Pachiammal

11. Valarmathi

12. Madhammal

13. Ayyammal

14. Vijaya

15. Ramu @ Ramayee

16. Lakshmi

17. Valli .. Respondents in CRP.No.4441 of 2023

1. Ramar

2. Manickam

3. Madhu

4. Rathinammal

5. Ranjitha

6. Chandra

7. Dhanam

8. Iyyammal

9. Sengodan

10. Thangarasu

11. Poongavanam

12. Mannathan Vaiyapuri (Died)

13. Rajammal

14. Sambu 15.Sagunthala

16. Sowndararajan

17. Balakrishnan

18. Nagammal

19. Muthulakshmi

20. Pachiammal

21. Valarmathi ... Respondents in CRP.No.4445 of 2023 Prayer in CRP.No.4441 of 2023 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to issue direction to the learned Principal District Court, Salem to dispose of Tr.O.P.No.148 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible within the time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court. Prayer in CRP.No.4445 of 2023 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to issue direction to the learned Principal District Court, Salem to dispose of Tr.O.P.No.151 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible within the time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioner in both CRPs.

: Mr.N.Manoharan For Respondents in both CRPs. : No appearance COMMON ORDER The petitioner has filed these petitions to direct the learned Principal District Court, Salem to dispose of Tr.O.P.Nos.148 of 2022 and 151 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible within the time frame fixed by this Court.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Transfer original petitions were preferred by the 1st respondent herein, who appeared and submitted his objection long back but the Presiding officer of the District Court is not dispose of the petitions and continuously giving adjournment.

3. On a perusal of the records, it reveals that, the respondent appeared and submitted their objections and the case is adjourned for enquiry, because of the pendency of the Transfer Original petitions, the parties are not able to proceed with the original suit, which was filed in the year 2018 and the suit is pending before the trial Court for more than 5 years. Therefore the learned Principal District Judge, Salam is directed to dispose of the Tr.O.P.Nos.148 of 2022 and 151 of 2022 on merits, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

T.V.THAMIL SELVI, J.

rri

4. Accordingly, these Civil Revision petitions are allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 08.12.2023 Index : Yes/No Speaking order / Non speaking order rri To 1.The learned Principal District Court, Salem. 2.The Section Officer, VR-Section, High Court of Madras.

CRP.Nos.4441 & 4445 of 2023