Prasathkumar v. The State Rep By Its,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.10.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Prasathkumar S/o.Raja
...Petitioner
Vs.
State rep. by Sub Inspector of Police Thirupathur Town Police Station Thirupathur District (Crime No.427 of 2024)
...Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. Act, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No.427 of 2024 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinothkumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ***** 1/6
O R D E R
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.10.2024 for the offences under Sections 6(b) and 24(1) of COTPA and Section 123 of BNS Act, in Crime No.427 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of banned tobacco products worth about Rs.20,000/-. Hence, this case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.10.2024; that he is a law-abiding citizen; that he is ready to furnish substantial sureties for his due release on bail. Therefore, he prays for the grant of bail to the petitioner.
2/6
4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) opposes the grant of bail to the petitioner stating that the petitioner is the sole accused and on the date of occurrence, he was found in illegal possession of banned tobacco products worth about Rs.20,000/-. He further submitted that there is no previous case against the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the nature of offence, there is no previous case pending against the petitioner, and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner from 13.10.2024, and also considering all others factors, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur and on further conditions that:
[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent 3/6
police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of 30 days and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [b] the petitioner shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond;
[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court 4/6
in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
29.10.2024 ksa-2 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur 2.The Superintendent of Prison, Sub Jail, Thirupathur 3.Sub Inspector of Police Thirupathur Town Police Station Thirupathur District 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
5/6
P.DHANABAL, J.
ksa-2 29.10.2024 6/6