Parasuraman v. The State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI 1.Parasuraman 2.Santhakumar ... Petitioners Vs.
State of Tamil Nadu rep by:- The Sub Inspector of Police Natrampalli Police Station Tirupattur District Crime No.247 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioners on bail in Crime No.247 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners :
Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent :
Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)
O R D E R
The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.08.2025 for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 118(2), 351(3), 329(3), 109(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, in Crime No.247 of 2025, on the file of respondent police, seeks bail.
1/6
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners and the defacto complainant are neighbours. On 14.08.2025 at about 9.00 p.m. there was a wordy quarrel between them. In continuation of the same, at about 01.00 a.m. when the defacto complainant and her son was sleeping in their house, the defacto complainant heard a sound of opening of her house door. When she woke up, she found the first petitioner throwing stone (mk;kp FHtp fy;) on the head of her son due to which, the son of the defacto complainant sustained injuries. On hearing the noise, her neighbour by name Megala came out from her house and she was also attacked by the first petitioner with iron rod. Thereafter, the first petitioner along with his brother/second petitioner threatened them to do away by showing iron rod and wooden log. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioners have been suffering incarceration from 15.08.2025. Hence, he seeks for grant of bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that on the date of occurrence the first petitioner attacked the son of the defacto complainant and one Megala, the neighbour of the defacto complainant with stone and iron rod and thereafter, both the petitioners threatened them to do away. He further 2/6
submitted that the victim has been discharged from the hospital.
5. Considering the fact that the victim has been discharged from the hospital and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, both the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.247 of 2025. On such deposit, the petitioners shall be released on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirupattur, subject to the following further conditions: (a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police on alternative days at 10.30 a.m. for the period of three months.
(c) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
3/6
(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
(g) The petitioners are directed to produce the deposit receipts before the concerned Magistrate. On such deposit, the defacto complainant shall be permitted to withdraw the same. 11.09.2025 ksa-2 4/6
To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirupattur 2.The Sub Inspector of Police Natrampalli Police Station Tirupattur District
3. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Note :-
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the Official Website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR Code.
5/6
T.V.THAMILSELVI , J.
ksa-2 11.09.2025 6/6