Vike Alias Vignesh v. State Rep By

P.DHANABAL,J.

The petitioner/A2 who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 303(2) and 326 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.666 of 2024 seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with another were illegally transported 5 bags of river sand, each contains 25kgs of river sand without having valid permission. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions imposed by this Court. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submits that thehe petitioner along with another were illegally transported 5 bags of river sand, each contains 25kgs of river sand without having valid permission. He further submits that there is no previous case against the petitioner. He further submits that the co-accused was arrested and still in custody. Hence, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the nature of offences charged against the petitioner and quantity of river sand involved in this case and also the fact that the prime accused was arrested and he is still in custody and there is no previous case against the petitioner and considering all other aspects, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. [b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as

laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

29.10.2024 Vv

P.DHANABAL, J.

Vv 29.10.2024