R.Rayadurai, v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.24950 of 2017 R.Rayadurai ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Represented by 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Virudhachalam, Cuddalore District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pennaadam PS Thittakudi Taluk, Cuddalore District.

...Respondents

Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant permission for the demonstration with speaker.

For Petitioner : Dr.S.Manoharan For Respondents: Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to grant permission for the demonstration with speaker.

2. It is seen that the petitioner has filed this petition to direct the respondents to grant permission for the demonstration with speaker. Now, almost two years have been lapsed and hence, due to the lapse of period, the prayer sought for by the petitioner has become infructuous. 3.

With the above observation, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pds/lok https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Virudhachalam, Cuddalore District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pennaadam PS Thittakudi Taluk, Cuddalore District.

W.P.No.24950 of 2017 CA(CO) GN(10/05/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/