Sathik Basha v. The State Rep By

P.DHANABAL,J.

The petitioners/A1, A3, A4 and A5 who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 296)b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Crime No.526 of 2024 seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a previous enmity already existing between the petitioners and the defacto complainant regarding property dispute, due to which, the petitioners had abused and attacked the defacto complainant and his friends and caused injuries and also threatened them with dire consequence. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that they are ready to abide by any stringent conditions imposed by this Court. Therefore, he

prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submits that there was a property dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, due to which, the petitioners had abused and assaulted the defacto complainant and his friends and caused injuries to him. He admits that the injured was discharged from the hospital. He further submits that there is no previous case against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the nature of offence, there was a property dispute between the parties and the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and also the fact that there is no previous case against the petitioners and considering all other aspects, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankarapuram on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute separate bonds for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of eight weeks. [b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and

the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

29.10.2024 Vv

P.DHANABAL, J.

Vv 29.10.2024