Govindan v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.03.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.32446 of 2019 Govindan

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mettur Dam, Salem District.

2.The Tahsildar, Kandayampatti Taluk, Salem District.

3.Vasantha ..Respondents Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to pass appropriate order vide his proceedings in Ku.Ko.2530/2013 (A) within a stipulated period prescribed by this Hon'ble Court and subsequently cancel the Patta No.1284 on the file of 2nd respondent stands in favour of 3rd respondent by restore earlier Patta No.775 stands in favour of the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Deepakkumar For R 1 & R 2 : Mr.J.Purushothaman Government Advocate

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he also made an endorsement to that effect.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.

In view of the submissions and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar KP To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mettur Dam, Salem District.

2.The Tahsildar, Kandayampatti Taluk, Salem District.

+1cc to Government Pleader Sr.No.19744 W.P.No.32446 of 2019 PVS(CO) GS(22/05/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/