← Library
Madras High CourtCMP/26332/2023ordered

Usha v. S.Arafath

2024-06-04Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh1 pages

CMP No.26332 of 2023 in CMA SR No.143922 of 2023 N.ANAND VENKATESH,J Since the first respondent remained ex parte before the Tribunal below, notice to him has already been dispensed with. Notice has been served on the second respondent and he is represented through a counsel.

2. This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 323 days in filing the main civil miscellaneous appeal.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the second respondent and perused the records.

4.

Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the civil miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 323 days is condoned.

5. It is made clear that for the period of delay of 323 days, the petitioners/appellants will not be entitled for any interest in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal below.

6. Registry is directed to number the main civil miscellaneous appeal and list the same for admission. When the matter is posted for admission, the name of learned counsel for second respondent shall also be printed in the cause-list.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis RS 04.6.2024