← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/27712/2024disposed of

Santhosh v. M/S. Green Malabar Finance Venture Ltd

2024-12-09Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 09.12.2024 Coram:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.15374 of 2024 -- Mr.Santhosh .. Petitioner Vs.

1. M/s.Green Malabar Finance Ventures Ltd., Represented by its Director Mr.Suresh Gurumani, No.20C/2A, Sarangapani Street, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.

duly Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Mr.K.R.Vijay

2. M/s.JMRC Fuel Service, Rep. by its Proprietor Mr.U.V.Baby Koulsalya, No.299/3B, Veerasingamani Village, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli-627 862.

3. Mrs.U.V.Baby Kousalya .. Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act to call for the entire records pending on the file of Fast Track Court-II, Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, at Allikulam in S.T.C.No.1708 of 2022 and quash the proceedings in S.T.C.No.1708 of 2022 on the file of the Fast Track Court-II, Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, at Allikulam, Chennai, insofar as the petitioner/Accused No.3 herein.

For petitioner : Mr.V.Yurendrakumar For respondents : Mr.M.Chinnathambi for R-1 1 / 5

Not ready in notice for RR-2 & 3

ORDER

The present petition is filed to call for the entire records pending on the file of Fast Track Court-II, Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, at Allikulam in S.T.C.No.1708 of 2022 and quash the proceedings in S.T.C.No.1708 of 2022 on the file of the Fast Track Court-II, Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, at Allikulam, Chennai, insofar as the petitioner/Accused No.3.

2. The petitioner has been arrayed as A.3. The first respondent has filed a complaint against the petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, on the file of the Fast Track Court No.II, Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, at Allikulam, Chennai in S.T.C.No.1708 of 2022.

3. It is seen from the records that the cheque was issued only by the Proprietor of the second respondent/concern, i.e. the third respondent herein. The petitioner/A3 is none other than the son of the third respondent herein.

4. Admittedly, the cheque was signed only by the third respondent herein, in the name of the second respondent-concern. Even there is no specific averment about the involvement of the petitioner/A3. There is no vicarious liability in respect of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the relatives or the drawer of the cheque, is/are personally 2 / 5

liable for issuance of the cheque for the family members. Therefore, the Court below failed to consider the fact that the petitioner is no way connected or involved in the transaction between the second and third respondents herein.

5. The cheque was also signed by the third respondent herein, i.e. in the name of the second respondent-concern, and therefore, the petitioner, who had been arrayed as A-3, is not liable for the same. Therefore, the case filed in S.T.C.No.1708 of 2022 is hereby quashed against the petitioner/A3 alone.

6. The Court below is directed to proceed with the case further as against the other accused persons. The Court below is directed to expedite the complaint filed in S.T.C.No.1708 of 2022 and complete the trial and dispose of the said S.T.C.No.1708 of 2022 on merits and in accordance with law, within three months from today, after giving an opportunity of hearing to both parties and both parties are directed to extend their fullest co-operation for disposal of the said S.T.C.No.1708 of 2022 itself within the above stipulated time.

7. With the above observations/directions, this petition is disposed of. Consequently, Crl.M.P.No.15374 of 2024 is closed. 09.12.2024 cs Office to note: Issue order copy on or before 11.12.2024 3 / 5

To

1. Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.II, Egmore @ Allikulam, Chennai.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 4 / 5

P.VELMURUGAN, J cs 09.12.2024 5 / 5