← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/909/2017dismissed

Dharman v. The District Collector

2021-03-10Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.03.2021 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN C.R.P(PD)No.909 of 2017 Dharman ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Tiruppur.

2.The Sub Collector, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.

3.The Tahsildar, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.

4.The Divisional Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.

5.The Assistant Divisional Engineer (East) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.

6.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Gramiam, Dharapuram, 7.The General Manager, Canara Bank, Zonal Officer, Chennai.

1/4

8.The Zonal Manager, Canara Bank, Zonal Office, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.

9.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Alankiyam, Dharapuram Taluk, 10.P.Radhakrishnan 11.The Executive Officer, Alankiyam Panchayat, Alankiyam, Dharapuram Taluk, ... Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the Docket Order dated 01.03.2017 in unnumbered O.S.S.R.No.821 of 2017 on the file of the District Munsif, Dharapuram, For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.S.Jaganathan Government Advocate (CS) [For R1 to R3 & 11] Mr.Navaneethan (SC) [For R7 & R8] Mr.V.Viswanathan [SC] [For R4 to R6] Mr.M.L.Ramesh [for R9] Mr.M.Guruprasad [for R10] ***** 2/4

O R D E R

The present civil revision petition is filed as against Docket Order dated 01.03.2017 in unnumbered O.S.S.R.No.821 of 2017 on the file of the District Munsif, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District, thereby returning the plaint as not maintainable.

2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit. He filed the suit as against the respondents herein for bare injunction restraining respondents 4 to 6 from giving electricity service connection to the 10th respondent herein. The said plaint was returned as not maintainable. Now, the learned counsel for the 10th respondent submitted that electricity service connection has already been given to him and the prayer sought in the suit has become infructuous.

3. Considering the above submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

10.03.2021 bri Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order 3/4

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J.

bri To The District Munsif, Dharapuram, C.R.P(PD)No.909 of 2017 10.03.2021 4/4