Borra Bhakthavatshal Reddy v. The State Rep.By Its

P.DHANABAL,J.

The petitioner/accused who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 303(2) and 326(a) of BNS and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, in Crime No.697 of 2024 seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally transported 10 units of river sand in a lorry bearing Regn.No.AP-16-TY-7657 without having valid permission. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that the petitioner is having proper licence from the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the co-accused was enlarged on bail by the lower Court. He further submits that he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions imposed by this Court. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submits that tthe petitioner had illegally transported 10 units of river sand in a lorry. He further submits that there is no previous case against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the nature of offences charged against the petitioner and quantity of river sand involved in this case and also the fact that there is no previous case against the petitioner and the petitioner is the owner of the lorry and he is having proper permit from the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the co-accused was enlarged on bail by the lower Court and considering all other aspects, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruttani on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks . [b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as

laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

30.10.2024 Vv P.DHANABAL, J.

Vv 30.10.2024