S.Nandhakumar v. State Of Tamil Nadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. K.R. SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY S.NANDHAKUMAR S/O.SUBBAYAN, FORMER VILLAGE PRESIDENT NO.2/34, MUDALIPALAYAM PERUMALPALAYAM VILLAGE KUNDADAM PANCHAYAT UNION KANGEYAM TALUK PETITIONER Vs.
1.
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FORT ST.GEORGE CHENNAI-600 009 THE MEMBER SECRETARY TAMIL NADU POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD NO.76, MOUNT SALAI GUINDY CHENNAI-600 032 THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING II, III and IV FLOORS C AND E MARKET ROAD KOYAMBEDU, CHENNAI-600 107 1/5
4.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE OF THE COLLECTORATE TIRUPPUR DISTRICT-641 604 5.
THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE DISTRICT COLLECTORATE PERUMTHITTA CAMPUS TIRUPPUR 6.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DISTRICT TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING OFFICE 7.
THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER KUNDADAM PANCHAYAT BLOCK KUNDADAM 8.
THE PRESIDENT PERUMALPALAYAM VILLAGE PANCHAYAT 9.
AMARAVATHY COIR PRODUCER COMPANY LTD.
REP. BY KANDAVEL AND FOUR OTHERS PULLIYAMPATTI ROAD MUDALIPALAYAM POST KANGEYAM TALUK, TIRUPPUR-638 703 RESPONDENTS Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the 8th respondent to implement the rejection order passed by the 8th respondent dated 13.03.2024 and consequential stop work notice dated 25.04.2024 and accordingly, to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.07.2024 and consequently direct the 8th respondent to take action against the 9th respondent industry for illegally establishing in the name of Amaravathy 2/5
Coir Producer Company Ltd. at R.S. Nos.776/2A & 776/2B in Mudalipalayam Village, Perumalpalayam Panchayat, Kangeyam Taluk, Tiruppur District under Rule 22 of the Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Rules, 2019.
For petitioner Ms. A. Pramila For RR 1 to 8 Mr. A. Edwin Prabakar State Government Pleader assisted by Mr. Karthik Jeganath Government Advocate For R9 Mr. C. Prakasam
ORDER
(made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The prayer in the petition is for a mandamus to direct respondent no.8 to implement the rejection order passed by respondent no.8 against respondent no.9 and to take action against respondent no.9. If order of respondent no.8 is implementable or enforceable, certainly, respondent no.8 will take action as required under law. Petition is dismissed. No costs.
3/5
(K.R. SHRIRAM, C.J.) (SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.) 05.12.2024 Index :
Yes/No :
Yes/No cad To 1.
THE SECRETARY REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU FORT ST.GEORGE, CHENNAI-600 009 THE MEMBER SECRETARY TAMIL NADU POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD NO.76, MOUNT SALAI GUINDY, CHENNAI-600 032 THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING II, III and IV FLOORS C AND E MARKET ROAD, KOYAMBEDU CHENNAI-600 107 4.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE OF THE COLLECTORATE TIRUPPUR DISTRICT-641 604 5.
THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE DISTRICT COLLECTORATE PERUMTHITTA CAMPUS, TIRUPPUR 6.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DISTRICT TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING OFFICE 7.
THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER 4/5
KUNDADAM PANCHAYAT BLOCK KUNDADAM, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT 8.
THE PRESIDENT PERUMALPALAYAM VILLAGE PANCHAYAT THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
cad 05.12.2024 5/5