Madras High CourtWP Crl./774/2025closed

R.Monisha v. The State Rep. By

2025-09-09Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR R.Monisha Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State, represented by Inspector of Police, Tambaram CCB, Sholinganallur Chennai 600 119.

2. The Commissioner of Police, O/o.Tambaram Commissionerate, Sholinganallur 600 119

3. S.Sathish Kumar

4. J. Indrapriyadharshini Respondent(s)

PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Art.226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the 1 st respondent to take necessary actions based on the written information (Ref No. ECM25346698) dated 03.07.2025.

For Petitioner(s):

K. Selvaganapathy For Respondent:

Mr.R.Vinothraja, GA (Crl.side) for R1and R2

ORDER

st respondent to take necessary This Writ Petition is filed to direct the 1 actions based on the written information (Ref No. ECM25346698) dated 03.07.2025.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had rd respondent - Satish Kumar and his wife -4 th lodged a complaint against 3 respondent namely Indira Priyadarshani alleging that on the assurance given by said Sathish Kumar and his wife Indira Priyadarshani that they would give monthly returns deriving from their trading profits, the petitioner and her husband jointly invested Rs.58 lakhs through online in various instalments

into the account of the abovesaid Sathish Kumar. Later, when they failed to remit the monthly returns, the petitioner came to know that they have rd and 4 th respondents have defrauded absconded from their place. Thus, the 3 the petitioner and her husband by taking away their hard earned money.

3. Having regard to the same, the petitioner lodged a complaint against rd and 4 th respondent with the 2 nd respondent, which constitutes a the 3 cognizable offence under sections 316 and 318 of BNSS Act, 2023.

4. It is the grievance of the petitioner that despite lodging written information with the respondents 1 and 2 on two occasions, no action has been taken by the respondent police on the complaint lodged by the petitioner. Hence, the present writ petition.

5. The learned Govt. Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent, on nd instructions, submitted that the complaint which was lodged before the 2 respondent/Commissioner Office, Tambaram Commissionerate has been forwarded to Central Crime Branch, Tambaram. On receipt of the said

complaint, the Central Crime Branch, Tambaram will look into the matter and investigate the same properly.

6. In view of the above, let the investigation be conducted by Central Crime Branch, Tambaram. The Central Crime Branch, Tambaram is directed to complete the investigation as expeditiously as possible.

7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. msr 09-09-2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes To

1. The State, represented by Inspector of Police, Tambaram CCB, Sholinganallur Chennai 600 119.

2. The Commissioner of Police, O/o.Tambaram Commissionerate, Sholinganallur 600 119

N.SATHISH KUMAR J.

msr 09-09-2025