A.Subramani Chettiyar v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.01.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.32841 of 2019 A.Subramani Chettiyar

...Petitioner

Vs

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Arani, Thiruvannamalai District.

2. The Tahsildar, Polur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

3. The District Revenue Officer, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District.

[R3 impleaded as per order dated 03.02.2020 made in W.M.P.No.292 of 2020 in W.P.No.32841 of 2019]

...Respondents

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.12.2018 based on the communication sent by the first respondent in O.MU.A2/2203/2018, dated 11.01.2019, within the time frame that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Aloysius Raja Pragash For Respondents : Mr.V.Jeevagiridharan Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

This writ petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.12.2018 based on the communication sent by the first respondent in O.MU.A2/2203/2018, dated 11.01.2019, within the time frame that may be fixed by this Court. 2.The petitioner submitted representation to rectify the mistake committed by the Revenue Authorities during the UDR https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Scheme by including 7 cents in S.No.659/1A. The actual property for the said 7cents lies in S.No.659/1B. The said representation was made before the first respondent and the same was forwarded to the second respondent to rectify the mistake committed during UDR Scheme, but the competent authority to rectify the said mistake is only the third respondent.

3.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh application to rectify the mistake before the third respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the same, the third respondent is directed to dispose of the said application, after issuance of notice to the petitioner and counter parties, if any and after giving an opportunity of hearing to them, pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks thereafter, if not already disposed of.

4.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kv To

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Arani, Thiruvannamalai District.

2. The Tahsildar, Polur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

3. The District Revenue Officer, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District.

+2cc to Mr.D.S.Ravikumaar, Advocate, S.R.No.4538 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.4929 W.P.No.32841 of 2019 MT(CO) RGA(08/03/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/