Sivanya @ Angel v. The State Rep By

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioner/A7, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 336, 427, 392, 397 and 506(2) of IPC, in Crime No.249 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant Kuppudoss is that on 20.09.2024, the petitioner along with the other accused, created ruckus in the jewellery shop and also caused damages to the furnitures. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that 1/3

based on the complaint given by one, Kuppudoss, who is the Manager of the jewellery shop, a case was registered against the transgenders for creating ruckus in the jewellery shop. He would further submit that investigation has been completed and final report has been filed before the V Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, however, the petitioner is not an accused in the final report.

6.Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. 05.11.2024 ata 2/3

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

ata 05.11.2024 3/3