← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/27670/2024granted

Periyathambi v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-11-05Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira4 pages

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(C) and 4(1-A)ii of Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024, in Crime No.211 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 10 litres of illicit arrack and 400 kgs of Jaggery. Hence, the case.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner's barren land was misused by some accused persons. He would further submit that the petitioner has no previous case against him. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the 1/4

petitioner was found in illegal possession of 10 litres of illicit arrack and 400 kgs of Jaggery. He would further submit that there is no previous case against the petitioner. He would further submit that the petitioner is having six previous cases similar in nature. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

7.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that no previous case is pending against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate, Sankarapuram, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, 2/4

failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

05.11.2024 ata 3/4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

ata 05.11.2024 4/4