Metropolitan Transport Corporation v. P.Ramamurthy And Another

A.No.5882 of 2024 in C.S.No.100 of 2022 Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

The suit is filed to declare the plaintiff as the owner of the suit schedule property and to seek a mandatory injunction directing the defendant to quit and deliver the vacant possession.

2.

After the commencement of the trial, the plaintiff filed an application to receive additional documents.

3.

The 1st defendant, who is in occupation of the suit premises, filed a counter stating that the documents sought to be relied upon by the plaintiff are not relevant to the suit. Furthermore, the inordinate delay in introducing the documents not been properly explained.

4.

Considering the objection as well as the nature of the document now sought to be introduced, this Court is of the view that, for a proper decision, the documents are necessary, subject to proof and relevancy.

5.

The application is allowed. For inordinate delay in introducing the documents, the applicant/plaintiff is liable to pay costs of Rs.5,000/- to the 1st defendant on or before 19.12.2024.

6.

Post the matter before the Additional Master II for recording evidence on 06.01.2024.

06.12.2024 rpl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis