Manikandan v. The Inspector Of Police,

A.D.

JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3), 324(4), 329(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 r/w Section 4 of TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 in Crime No.675 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the wordy quarrel started between defacto complainant and the petitioner, and other accused person. Further, it has been alleged that the petitioner and other accused person used filthy language and attempt to assault the defacto complainant. Hence the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner, aged about 28 years, is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that due to the previous enmity, there was some 1/4

wordy quarrel. He further submitted that no previous cases are pending against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Poonamalle, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: (a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to 2/4

ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner shall report before the Chengalput Town Police Station everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. 05.11.2024 rna 3/4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.

rna 05.11.2024 4/4