← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/24591/2025dismissed

M. Suman v. The State Rep By Its,

2025-09-09Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.09.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI M.Suman ... Petitioner Vs.

State rep by:- The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur North Police Station, Tiruppur District.

(Crime No.717 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in Crime No.717 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :

Mr.S.Selvam For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.06.2025 for the alleged offences under Sections 103(1) @ 61(2), 103(1) and 49 of BNS, in Crime No.717 of 2025, on the file of respondent police, seeks bail. 1/4

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.06.2025 the petitioner committed the murder of the deceased Balamurugan through his henchmen, due to political enmity in their locality. Hence, the complaint was lodged.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration from 26.06.2025. Hence, he seeks the grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that there are a total of 6 accused persons, in which the petitioner is ranked as A3. He further submitted that, due to political enmity the petitioner colluded with the other accused and committed murder of the deceased. Since the petitioner left the political party, he bore a grudge against the deceased and, at his instigation, A2 along with the other accused, committed the murder. Besides, the petitioner has five previous cases, one of which is 307 IPC, and he also a history-sheeter in H.S.No.861 of 2011. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner.

2/4

5. On seeing the antecedents of the petitioner /A2, as well as the previous motive, it is evident that he attacked the deceased. If he is released on bail, he may abscond, tamper with the evidence, and hamper the witnesses. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09.09.2025 rri To 1.The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur North Police Station, Tiruppur District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras 3/4

T.V.THAMILSELVI , J.

rri 09.09.2025 4/4