E.Murugan v. The State, Represented By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.12.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. RAJAMANICKAM Crl.O.P. No. 31940 of 2019 E.Murugan
...Petitioner
vs The State, represented by Inspector of Police, J.9, Duraipakkam Police Station, Duraipakkam, Chennai.
...Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent to take further action on the basis of the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated 25.05.2018 on the file of the respondent herein in accordance with law to secure the ends of justice. For Petitioner : Mr. P.Britto For Respondent : Mr. M. Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to take further action on the basis of the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated 25.05.2018 on the file of the respondent herein in accordance with law to secure the ends of justice.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent.
3. This petition is not maintainable, in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Crl.O.P (MD) No. 13681 of 2018 and a batch of cases, dated 20.09.2018, liberty is given to the petitioner to workout his remedy as per the direction given by the Hon'ble Division Bench. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar kv To
1. The Inspector of Police, J.9, Duraipakkam Police Station, Duraipakkam, Chennai.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
+1 CC to Mr.B. Britto, Advocate sr 104098.
Crl.O.P. No. 31940 of 2019 AK(CO) SP(31/01/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/