Vinoth v. State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.02.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA Crl.O.P.No.32348 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.17811 of 2019

1. Vinoth

2. Shanmugam

3. Jayanthi

4. Kala

5. Ravi @ Ravikumar

...Petitioners

Vs.

1. The State represented by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Sathyamangalam, Erode.

2. R.Ishwarya

...Respondents

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.3 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Parthasarathy For 1st Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For 2nd Respondent : Mr.C.Rajaguru 1/4

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the FIR in Crime No. 3 of 2019, pending on the file of the 1st respondent Police.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Original Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 13.02.2023 vum Index:yes/No Speaking order / Non speaking order To 2/4

1. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Sathyamangalam, Erode.

2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

3/4

R.N.MANJULA,J.

Vum Crl.O.P.No.32348 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.17811 of 2019 13.02.2023 4/4