Noorjahan v. The Secretary To Government

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.09.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.D.KRISHNAKUMAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI in W.A.No.1122 of 2009 1.Noorjahan 2.S.M.Nayeemunisa 3.S.M.Zubaidunisa 4.Amthul Thawab 5.S.M.Asgari 6.M.Syed Moinuddin 7.M.Syed Jalaluddin 8.Shabir Hussain .. Petitioners Vs 1.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration, 3.The Special Commissioner and Director of Survey and Settlement,

4.The Settlement Officer, 5.The Chief Engineer, Highways Department, 6.Manali R.Srinivasan .. Respondents Prayer : Review Application filed under Order 47, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of CPC against the judgment dated 9.8.2023 passed in W.A.No.1122 of 2009.

For the Petitioners : Mr.V.Raghavachari Senior Counsel for Mr.P.Chandrasekar For the Respondents : Mr.R.Ramanlaal Addl. Advocate General assisted by Mr.T.Arunkumar Addl. Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 5

ORDER

(Delivered by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice) This review application is filed against the common judgment dated 9.8.2023 passed in W.A.No.1122 of 2009.

2. It appears that W.A.No.1122 of 2009 was heard along with

W.A.No.2041 of 2010 and W.P.No.715 of 2010. By the common judgment dated 9.8.2023, this Court dismissed W.A.No.1122 of 2009 and W.P.No.715 of 2010 and allowed W.A.No.2041 of 2010. W.A.No.1122 of 2009 and W.A.No.2041 of 2010 stemmed up from the same order passed in W.P.No.12425 of 2008 dated 29.4.2009.

3. Assailing the judgment passed in W.A.No.2041 of 2010, Manali R.Srinivasan, the sixth respondent herein (Respondent in W.A.No.2041 of 2010), preferred a Special Leave Petition, being Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No (s).47177 of 2023, before the Apex Court with delay condonation application. The Apex Court, by the order dated 15.3.2024, while condoning the delay, dismissed the Special Leave Petition.

4. In view of the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition which was filed against the common judgment, the present review application cannot be entertained. On merits, there is no error or illegality apparent on the face of record.

5. The review application is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

(D.K.K., ACJ.) (P.B.B, J.) 26.09.2024 Index :

Yes/No NC :

Yes/No bbr To 1.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration, 3.The Special Commissioner and Director of Survey and Settlement, 4.The Settlement Officer, 5.The Chief Engineer, Highways Department,

THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.B.BALAJI, J.

bbr 26.09.2024