← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/31786/2022granted

R.Iyyappan v. The State Rep By Its,

2022-12-23Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(i) of Indian Penal Code r/w Section 4 of Woman Harassment Act in Cr.No.434 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners are arrayed as A1 and A2. There was a dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant regarding agricultural land in which the petitioners abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked the defacto complainant. Hence, the defacto complainant sustained grievous injuries. Thereby, the law enforcing agency registered a case against the petitioners. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have not been committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and the defacto complainant had sustained only simple injuries. He would further submit that there is a case in counter registered against the defacto complainant. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl side) appearing for the petitioner submits that injured person has been treated as out patient and discharged from the hospital.

5. Considering the fact that it is a case and a case in counter and the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate at Uthukottai on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when

required for interrogation;

(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

23.12.2022 dk To The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate at Uthukottai. T.V.THAMILSELVI., J.

dk

23.12.2022