Madras High CourtCRL RC/112/2024disposed of

Dilip Bohra v. The State, Represented By

2024-07-03Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.07.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Dilip Bohra ... Petitioner -Vs1. The Sate, Rep. By Inspector of Police, MGR Nagar Police station, Chennai-78.

2. Tamil Selvi ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal revision is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for records made order in Crl.M.P.No.10007 of 2022 dated 05.08.2022 passed by the 23rd Metropolitan Magistrate,Saidapet, Chennai-15 and set aside the same and direct the first respondent to return the car bearing Registration No.TN 06 K 9669, Mercedes BENZ, based on the agreement dated 18.06.2020 between the petitioner and the said Tamil Selvi/second respondent herein to secure the ends of justice. For petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondent : Mr.C.Durairaj R2 Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate R1 Crl. side 1/4

O R D E R

The Criminal Revision is filed against the order in Crl.M.P.No.10007 of 2022 dated 05.08.2022 passed by the 23rd Metropolitan Magistrate,Saidapet, Chennai-15 and direct the first respondent to return the car bearing Registration No.TN 06 K 9669, Mercedes BENZ, based on the agreement dated 18.06.2020 between the petitioner and the said Tamil Selvi/second respondent herein to secure the ends of justice.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant, the vehicle was seized by the respondent police. To recover the said car, the petitioner filed a petition before the trial Court and the same was dismissed. Further, during pendency of the revision, the matter is amicably settled between the petitioner and the defacto complainant and therefore, this Court may direct the first respondent to release the vehicle.

3. The learned counsel for the defacto complainant submitted that she has no objection for releasing the vehicle to the petitioner. 2/4

4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and recording the submission made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the first respondent to release vehicle to the petitioner in the manner known to law.

6. With the above direction, the revision case is disposed of. 03.07.2024 rli Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No To

1. The Inspector of Police, MGR Nagar Police station, Chennai-78.

2. The 23rd Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai-15.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High court of Madras.

3/4

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

Rli 03.07.2024 4/4