← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/1063/2023granted

D.M.C.Joseph v. State By The Inspector Of Police

2023-01-19Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 406, 420, 323 & 506 (1) of IPC in Crime No.1163 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on undertaking agreement, the petitioner along with other accused had obtained a sum of Rs.20 lakhs from the defacto complainant and his brother to rent the petitioner's shop to the defacto complainant. After receipt of the above said amount, the petitioner had refused to hand over the possession of the shop to the defacto complainant, due to which there aroused dispute between them. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this 1/4

case. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that on undertaking agreement, the petitioner along with other accused had obtained a sum of Rs.20 lakhs from the defacto complainant and his brother and cheated them. He further submitted that the co-accused already released on bail. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration, the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel and co-accused also released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the 2/4

date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Aalandhur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of six weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; (c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been 3/4

imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

gbi Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

19.01.2023 gbi 4/4