← Library
Madras High CourtWP/34420/2025disposed of

K.Palani v. The State Information Commissioner

2025-09-15Honourable Mr.Justice V. Lakshminarayanan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.09.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN Writ Petition No.34420 of 2025 K. Palani ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The State Information Commissioner, O/o. State Information Commission, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.

2.The First Apellate Authority, Block Developmetn Officer, (V/P), Ellapuram Panchayat Union, Periyapalayam Post, Uthukottait Aluk, Thiruvallur District 601 102.

3.The Public Information Officer O/o Block Development Office, Authupakkam Panchayat Ellapuram Panchayatunion, Periyapalayam Post, Uthukottait Aluk, Thiruvallur District 601 102.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to 1/5

dispose the petitioner second appeal dated 05.07.2024 filed under RTI Act and consequently issue suitable directions to the 3rd respondent to furnish the information as per the RTI application dated 04.07.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Bharathy For Respondents : Ms. Vadivu For Mr.Vigneshwaran, for R1 Mr.Alagu Gowtham, for R2 Mr.M.Shajahan, Special Government Pleader, for R3 ********

ORDER

I heard Ms.D.Bharathy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms.Vadivu, learned counsel for Mr.Vigneshwaran, for the first respondent, Mr.Alagu Gowtham, for the second respondent and Mr.M.Shajahan, learned Additional Government Pleader for the third respondent.

2. The petitioner has preferred an Appeal before the first respondent as against the order of the second respondent. His grievance is though he had made representations stating that the Appeal is pending for more than 2/5

one year, there has been no response. Hence he approached the third respondent again for information. Even then, he was not benefited with any information. Hence this Writ Petition for the aforesaid relief.

3. When the matter was taken up for admission Ms.V.Vadivu, representing Mr.Vignesh, stated that the Second Appeal before the first respondent has been taken on file as SA No.8931 of 2024 and the same is pending consideration. Considering the fact that the petitioner is a senior citizen, the first respondent requested to give priority, in case, it is open to it.

4. With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

15.09.2025 jv Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking order/Non Speaking order 3/5

To

1. The State Information Commissioner, O/o. State Information Commission, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.

2.The First Apellate Authority, Block Developmetn Officer, (V/P), Ellapuram Panchayat Union, Periyapalayam Post, Uthukottait Aluk, Thiruvallur District 601 102.

3.The Public Information Officer O/o Block Development Office, Authupakkam Panchayat Ellapuram Panchayatunion, Periyapalayam Post, Uthukottait Aluk, Thiruvallur District 601 102.

4/5

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J.

jv Writ Petition No.34420 of 2025 15.09.2025 5/5