V.Boopathi v. K.Ravi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 12.02.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI and CMP.No.23467 of 2025 V.Boopathi ... Appellant Vs.

K.Ravi ... Respondent Prayer:- Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of CPC., to set aside the judgement and decree passed in O.S.No.225 of 2021 dated 20.12.2024 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge (FTC), Kancheepuram. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.M.Kempraj J U D G E M E N T Pursuant to the learned counsel for the appellant reporting "no instructions", this Court had directed the name of the appellant to be printed in the cause list and posted the matter under the caption "for dismissal" today. The appeal is listed today under the said caption. There 1/3

is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Even earlier, sufficient time had been granted to the appellant not only to comply with the conditional order passed by this Court granting interim protection as against the execution proceedings, but also to prosecute the appeal. 2.In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the Appeal Suit for non-prosecution. Accordingly, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. 12.02.2026 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking Order kv To The Additional District Judge (FTC), Kancheepuram. 2/3

P.B.BALAJI, J.

kv 12.02.2026 3/3