Alamelu Ammal v. Murugan

C.M.P.No.26049 of 2019 in Rev.Appl.No.SR148781 of 2019 P.T.ASHA, J., The notice which has been sent through the Court has been returned with the endorsement "Insufficient Address". The notice which has been sent privately to the very same address has been received by the respondents on 06.03.2021. The affidavit of service to the effect has been filed. Therefore, service is deemed to have been effected on the respondents.

2. No one entered appearance on behalf of the respondents. The petitioners have given sufficient reasons for condoning the delay in the affidavit filed in support of the petition for condoning the delay. The reasons being sufficient the delay is condoned.

3. The Registry is directed to number the above Second Appeal. 18.08.2021 kan 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

P.T.ASHA, J., kan C.M.P.No.26049 of 2019 in Rev.Appl.No.SR148781 of 2019 18.08.2021 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/