S. Arumugam v. The General Manager, Canara

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.04.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.P.No.16053 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.No.19029 of 2004 S.Arumugam ... Petitioner versus

1. The General Manager, Canara Bank, Head Office, Bangalore, Karnataka State.

2. The Assistant General Manager, Staff Section Officer, Canara Bank, Circle Office, Madurai.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order made in Ref:MDUC:SSO:1080:E9:USN dated 11.03.2004 passed by the second respondent, to quash the same and to direct the respondents to pay the entire monetary retirement benefits to the petitioner. For Petitioner :

No appearance For Respondents:

Mr.C.Seethapathy

ORDER

Despite the matter being listed today under the caption "For Dismissal", there is no representation for the petitioner. However, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents is present and ready. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ogy To

1. The General Manager, Canara Bank, Head Office, Bangalore, Karnataka State.

2. The Assistant General Manager, Staff Section Officer, Canara Bank, Circle Office, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.C.SEETHAPATHY, Advocate, S.R.No. 32643 W.P.No.16053 of 2004 TR(07/06/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/