← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/4923/2025dismissed as infructuous

U. Villarasi, v. Park Town Benefit Fund Limited,

2026-04-08Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08-04-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRP Nos. 4923 & 4926 of 2025 and CMP.No.24885 of 2025 in CRP.No.4926 of 2025

1. U. Villarasi, Wife of Uthirapathy, residing at D.No.61, Uadayam Palace, Junction Road, Viruthachalam Town -606 001.

2. R. Vimala, Wife of Ramadoss, residing at D.No.61, Uadayam Palace, Junction Road, Viruthachalam Town -606 001.

3. Uthirapathy, Son of Rajangam, residing at D.No.61, Uadayam Palace, Junction Road, Viruthachalam Town -606 001.

..Petitioner(s) in both CRPs Vs Park Town Benefit Fund Limited, rep. by its Chairman, R.Vivekananthan, No.p995, Second Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai -600 040.

..Respondent(s) in both CRPs PRAYER in CRP.No.4923 of 2025: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 21.03.2025 in I.A.No.2 of 2024 in O.S.No.5112 of 2020 on the file of XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai and pass such further or other orders and thus render justice.

PRAYER in CRP.No.4926 of 2025: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article

227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 21.03.2025 in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in O.S.No.5112 of 2020 on the file of Honble XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai and pass such further or other orders and thus render justice.

For Petitioner(s) in both CRPs:

MR.T.Saikrishnan For Respondent(s) in both CRPs:

MR.M.SANKAR COMMON ORDER Before the trial Court, the plaintiff filed two applications: one to condone the delay in filing a petition to restore the suit, which was dismissed for default on 01.09.2021, and another to restore the suit. Both applications were allowed on merits by the trial Judge. Consequently, the suit was restored, and evidence has been adduced on the side of the plaintiff. Challenging the said orders, the defendant has filed the present revision.

2. Both the learned counsel appeared. The learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff submitted that, after restoration of the suit, the plaintiff has adduced evidence and was cross examined by the defendant, and the matter is now posted for the defendant's evidence.

3. As on date, the orders have been complied with and the trial has already commenced; therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this

revision. In the result, the civil revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous. However, the trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial and dispose of the suit on merits in accordance with law. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

08-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order MPA To

1. The XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. 2.Park Town Benefit Fund Limited, rep. by its Chairman, R.Vivekananthan, No.p995, Second Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai -600 040.

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

MPA CRP Nos. 4923 & 4926 of 2025 and CMP.No.24885 of 2025 in CRP.No.4926 of 2025 08-04-2026