← Library
Madras High CourtWP/35675/2024disposed of

Kokila v. The District Collector

2024-12-05Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated 05.12.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.No.35675 of 2024 Kokila ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, The Greater City Chennai, Chennai 600001.

2. The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk, Sholinganallur, Chennai.

3. The Zonal Officer, The greater Chennai Corporation, Zone-14, Puludhivakkam, Chennai.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue legal heir certificate to the petitioner on the death of her son B.Murugan for which she has sent representations dated 15.06.2024 and 17.06.2024.

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Vinothkumar

For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakandant, Additional Advocate General, Assisted by Mr.V.Ramesh, Government Advocate for first and second respondent Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi, Standing Counsel

ORDER

This writ petition is filed seeking direction to the respondent to issue Legal Heirship certificate to the petitioner on the death of her son Murugan, by considering her representations dated 15.06.2024 and 27.06.2024.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that her son Murugan died on 19.01.2010 leaving his mother/petitioner herein, wife Sathiya and minor child M.Angel. It is further stated by the petitioner that after death of Murugan, his wife Sathiya remarried and the minor child is under the custody of the petitioner. The petitioner submitted representations before the respondents on 27.06.2024 seeking issuance of Legal Heirship Certificate and based on her representation, the first respondent herein sent a communication to the second respondent on

23.08.2024 in Na.Ka.No.Oo6/e 2373162/2024, directing him to conduct enquiry and to pass necessary orders. Inspite of the same, the second respondent has not conducted any enquiry and therefore, the petitioner has come before this court.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. Inview of the fact that the first respondent already directed the second respondent to conduct enquiry on the representation submitted by the petitioner, the second respondent is directed to complete the enquiry and pass final orders on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.

5. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed. There shall be no order as to costs.

05.12.2024 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No mst To

1. The District Collector, The Greater City Chennai, Chennai 600001.

2. The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk, Sholinganallur, Chennai.

3. The Zonal Officer, The greater Chennai Corporation, Zone-14, Puludhivakkam, Chennai.

S.SOUNTHAR , J.

mst W.P.No.35675 of 2024 05.12.2024