N.Muninathan v. The District Revenue Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.06.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.18148 of 2017 And W.M.P.Nos.19689 to 19691 of 2017 N.Muninathan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Revenue Officer, Kanchipuram District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kanchipuram District.

3. The Tahsildhar, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kanchipuram District.

4. Venugopal

5. Padmavathi ... Respondents Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the third respondent in patta no.2793 issued in favour of the fifth respondent, quash the same.

For Petitioner :

Mr.B.Jegannath For Respondents :

Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan 1 to 3 Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.

2.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pri To

1. The District Revenue Officer, Kanchipuram District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kanchipuram District.

3. The Tahsildhar, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kanchipuram District.

+2ccs to Mr.A.Jenasenan, Advocate SR. No. 36353 +1cc to Government Pleader SR. No. 36953 W.P.No.18148 of 2017 And W.M.P.Nos.19689 to 19691 of 2017 RR (CO) PR (12/07/2022)