Vikram Udhayavarman v. State Rep By

Crl.M.P.Nos.18700 & 18702 of 2023 in Crl.O.P.No.6517 of 2023 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

The de-facto complainant is the wife of the first petitioner and daughter-in-law of the second petitioner.

2. On the representation made by the learned counsel for the de-facto complainant that there has been a specific bank transfer for a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- to the account of the 1st petitioner for dowry, this Court granted bail to the petitioners on condition that the petitioners shall jointly or individually deposit a sum of Rs.2 lakhs to the credit of Crime No.6 of 2023 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, and in turn the learned Judicial Magistrate shall hand over to the de-facto complainant.

3. The learned counsel states that the first petitioner only tied thali to the de-facto complainant which is sufficient for marriage to be performed and completed.

4. In view of the same, I am not inclined to modify the conditions imposed by this Court vide order dated 01.11.2023.

5. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed.

28.11.2023 nvi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis