← Library
Madras High CourtWP/27529/2017disposed of

M. Ravi v. The Principal Chief

2024-11-13Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.11.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.No.27529 of 2017 M.Ravi .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and Head of Forest Force, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

2.The Forest Engineer, Forest Engineering Division, No.11, Arabic College Street, Kaja Nagar, Trichirapalli - 620 020.

3.The Forest Ranger (Engineering) Tirupathur Range, Tirupathur, Vellore District.

4.The Conservator of Forest, Tirchirapalli Circle, Tirchirapalli.

.. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records in respect of order passed by the 2nd respondent in

Na.Ka.No.2487/2004/Va dated 07.06.2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to constitute a Empowered Standing Committee to resolve the claim of the petitioner on the basis of the representations given by the petitioner dated 21.11.2014 and 30.12.2014. For Petitioner .. Mr.D.Rajagopal For Respondents .. Mr.T.Seeenivasan Special Government Pleader

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed in a nature of Certiorarified Mandamus seeking records relating to an order passed by the 2nd respondent, the Forest Engineer, Forest Engineering Division, Trichirapalli in Na.Ka.No.2487/2004/Va dated 07.06.2017 and to quash the same and direct the respondents to constitute an Empowered Standing Committee to resolve the claim of the petitioner.

2.The writ petition has been filed in the year 2017. It is informed that, subsequently, the Empowered Committee had been constituted and after constitution, they had also examined the disputes relating to the work of improvement and black topping of road between Pudurnadu to Singarapettai. The Empowered Committee had also passed an award on

23.06.2023 stating that the claimant is entitled for a sum of Rs.13,61,260/- together with simple interest at 9% per annum from 31.03.2012 till the date of actual payment. It was also contended that the claimant was entitled to receive a sum of Rs.2,90,875/-, which was claim No.8. It is stated that the work under the PMGSY - IV were executed by the Highways Department in entirety and completed by the Highways Department. 3.The leaned counsel for the petitioner stated that inspite of several further communication, the award had not been put into effect. 4.But however, the petitioner will have to workout the remedy for enforcement of the award in the manner known to law. The scope of the relief sought in the writ petition is extremely narrow namely, to constitute a Empowered Committee, which had been constituted and the award had been passed. No further directions can be issued. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

13.11.2024 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No smv

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

smv To 1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and Head of Forest Force, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

2.The Forest Engineer, Forest Engineering Division, No.11, Arabic College Street, Kaja Nagar, Trichirapalli - 620 020.

3.The Forest Ranger (Engineering) Tirupathur Range, Tirupathur, Vellore District.

4.The Conservator of Forest, Tirchirapalli Circle, Tirchirapalli.

W.P.No.27529 of 2017

13.11.2024