Vellaisamy v. The State Rep By

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 304(2) of BNS and subsequently, altered as Sections 304(2) and 317(5) of BNS in Crime No.1177 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.

The case of the prosecution is that, the petitioner along with other accused had snatched and took away the mobile phone from the defacto complainant. Hence, this case.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and no way connected with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in the case, based on the confession of the arrested accused. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to produce solvent sureties and to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and also to appear and co-operate for the investigation, therefore, he prayed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 1/4

4.

Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police while opposing for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner along with other accused had involved in theft of the mobile phone of the defacto complainant. He would further submit that there is one previous case as against the petitioner and the investigation is pending, further the phone has not been recovered. 5.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record including the FIR. 6.

Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 7.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the 2/4

respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 6:30 p.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

3/4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

stn [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

20.11.2024 stn 4/4