Assistant Commissioner Of v. Reverco Apparel Company

C.M.P.No.17536 of 2017 in O.S.A.Sr.No.47540 of 2016 M.M.SUNDRESH, J., and S.KANNAMMAL, J., [Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.] The petitioner seeks leave to challenge the order dated 01.06.2016 sanctioning the Scheme of de-merger.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the order affects the interest of the petitioner with respect to the revenue which it is otherwise entitled to but for the approval of the Scheme of de-merger.

The petitioner has not been heard.

Though the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that no interference of the order is required, we are at the stage of granting leave and the matter requires adjudication upon hearing the petitioner.

Considering the same, we are inclined to grant leave. Accordingly, leave is granted.

(M.M.S., J.) (S.K., J.) 06.08.2021 mmi/ssm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/