S. Muthukumar v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.09.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR S.Muthukumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The State represented by, The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Cuddalore District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Annamalai Nagar Police Station, Cuddalore District.

... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the third respondent not to harass the petitioner on the guise of enquiry.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vadivalagia Nambi For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Criminal Side) 1/4

O R D E R

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the third respondent Police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of investigation/enquiry.

2.

It is the grievance of the petitioner that under the pretext of enquiry, the respondent Police are unnecessarily harassing the petitioner. 3.

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, submitted that based on the complaint given by the de facto complainant, an enquiry has been conducted in CSR and the same has been closed. Thereby, the presence of the petitioner is not required for further enquiry.

4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this Criminal Original Petition stands closed. 16.09.2025 ham 2/4

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Cuddalore District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Annamalai Nagar Police Station, Cuddalore District.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/4

N. SATHISH KUMAR , J.

ham 16.09.2025 4/4