Thangaraj v. Mrs.K.Karpagam And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.03.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU Thangaraj ..

Petitioner Vs.

1. K.Karpagam The District Collector Perambalur District Perambalur.

2. Sathiyabala Gangadharan The Revenue Divisional Officer Perambalur District Perambalur.

3. Mayakrishnan The Tahsildar Veppanthattai Taluk Perambalur District.

4. Kumaravel The Revenue Inspector Vaalikondapuram Block Veppanthattai Taluk Perambalur District.

..

Respondents

Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the order dated 07.8.2023 passed in W.P.No.26472 of 2021. For the Petitioner : Ms.Usha Ramman For the Respondents : Mr.T.K.Saravanan Government Advocate

ORDER

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) We have heard Ms.Usha Ramman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.T.K.Saravanan, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

2. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the Government has changed the pathway.

3. The dispute existed between the petitioner and the private respondents with regard to pathway. We had also observed that if the petitioner disputes the statement of the respondents/government

authorities with regard to the pathway as per the FMB sketch, then, the petitioner may avail the remedy as may be permissible under law.

4. It is for the petitioner to avail the remedy as may be permissible under law. Contempt petition would not be a remedy for that purpose. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of. (S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.) 26.03.2024 Index :

Yes/No :

Yes/No kpl

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

(kpl) 26.03.2024