← Library
Madras High CourtWP/3151/2024disposed of

P.Ravichandran v. The Inspector General Of Registration

2024-02-13Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan7 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.02.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and W.M.P.No.3419 of 2024 P.Ravichandran ... Petitioner versus 1.The Inspector General of Registration, I.G.Registration Office, 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai- 600 028.

2.The District Registrar (Admin), South Chennai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

3.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Tambaram,No.47/8, Venkatesan Street, Tambaram West, Chennai - 600 045.

Page Nos.1/7

4.The Sub Registrar, Pallavaram, Chennai - 600 043.

5.S.Madhan Kumar .....Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to pass orders on the petitioners complaint dated 01.03.2023 in a time bound manner. For Petitioner :

Mr.A.M.Venkata Krishnan For Respondents :

Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4

O R D E R

Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse orders are being passed against the fifth respondent, notice to the fifth respondent is dispensed with.

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a simple Page Nos.2/7

writ of mandamus, directing respondents 1 to 3 to pass orders on the petitioner's complaint dated 01.03.2023.

3.The main grievance of the petitioner is that even though he has given a complaint to the second respondent on 01.03.2023 seeking to conduct enquiry regarding the registration of sale deed by producing the forged documents, till date, the second respondent has not taken any action on the said complaint.

4. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 4 submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to conduct enquiry regarding forged documents. However, the enquiry under Section 77-A of the Registration Act, 1908 is pending before the Larger Bench of this Court. Hence, the respondents are not in a position to proceed with the complaint given by the petitioner.

5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. Page Nos.3/7

6.With regard to the amendment of Section 77-A of the Act, there are divergent decisions of two separate Benches of this Court as to whether the amendment of Section 77-A of the Act, has to be given retrospective effect or prospective effect and the said decisions have been referred to a Larger Bench to decide the matter. Hence, the proceedings under Section 77-A of the Act, are stayed by this Court. Pursuant to the same, the Inspector General of Registration also issued a Circular dated 29.09.2023 to the Registrars and the Sub-Registrars of the Registration Department that enquiry under Section 77-A of the Act, shall not be entertained.

7. Further, as the petitioner can either approach the Civil Court or wait till the outcome of the decision of the Larger Bench of this Court, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition by invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Page Nos.4/7

8. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the competent forum in the manner known to law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

13.02.2024 Index: Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, I.G.Registration Office, 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai- 600 028.

2.The District Registrar (Admin), South Chennai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

Page Nos.5/7

3.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Tambaram, No.47/8, Venkatesan Street, Tambaram West, Chennai - 600 045.

4.The Sub Registrar, Pallavaram, Chennai - 600 043.

Page Nos.6/7

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

ms 13.02.2024 Page Nos.7/7