Radhakrishnan v. State Rep. By
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1) of BNS, in Crime No.533 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioners assaulted the husband of the de-facto complainant by using hand, stone and wooden log, thereby he sustained injuries. Hence the case.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and due to previous enmity, a false complaint has been given against them. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent would submit that due to previous enmity, the petitioners altogether assaulted the husband of the de-facto complainant by using hand, stone and wooden log, thereby he sustained injuries. The injured had been discharged from the hospital. No previous case is pending
against the petitioners. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the FIR.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also of the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Chengalpattu, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 06.30 p.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required; [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.
14.11.2024 nvi
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.
nvi 14.11.2024