← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/399/2026dismissed

R.K. Ramasamy (Died) 1. Rajammal v. S. Gopal

2026-02-06Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 399 of 2026 and CMP.No.2256 of 2026 R.K. Ramasamy (died)

1. Rajammal

2. R.Balasundari @ R.Sundari

3. K.Vasanthi

4. B.Maniyarasi

5. R.Krishnamoorthy

6. Kasturbai alias Kasturi

7. R.Dharmaraj

8. R.Selvaraj Vs

1. S. Gopal

2. S.Murugesan

3. B.Krishnamoorthy

4. N.Theivasigamani

5. V.Balasubramaniam Document Writer, (License NO.1138/1984 Coimbatore) Lakshmi Nilayam, Nayakkan Thottam,

Avinashi Town Tiruppur District

6. The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office.

Avinasi

7. Sarada Devi

8. K.Vijayalakshmi ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to against the Fair and decreetal order 16.09.2023 made in IA No.8/2023 in OS No.89/2018, on the file of District Munsif Court, Avinasi. For Petitioner(s):

Mr.C.Prabakaran for Mr.C.S. Saravanan For Respondent(s):

Mr.N.Muthuvel for R6 Government Adovcate (CS)

ORDER

The civil revision petition is filed challenging the order passed by the trial court dismissing the application filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs seeking comparison of the thumb impression of the deceased first plaintiff Ramasamy found in the Sub-Registrar office of Avinashi relating to Document No. 3085 of 1996 dated 15.07.1996 with the admitted thumb impression.

2. It is seen from the impugned order that similar application was filed by the petitioners in IA.No.1331 of 2018 and the same was dismissed by the trial court. The petitioners, without challenging the said order, again filed another IA for the very same prayer in IA.No.3 of 2022 and the same was also

dismissed on 14.09.2022. Thereafter, the petitioners filed instant application seeking very same relief. When two earlier applications filed by the petitioners seeking very same relief have been rejected by the trial court, the third application filed by the petitioners is nothing but abuse of process of court. Therefore, the trial court rightly dismissed the same. I do not find any error in the impugned order passed by the trial court. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

06-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nr To

1. The District Munsif Court, Avinasi,

2. The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office.

Avinasi

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

NR CRP No. 399 of 2026 and CMP.No.2256 of 2026 06-02-2026