← Library
Madras High CourtWP/35143/2025disposed of

Paramasivam v. The District Collector

2025-10-22Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.10.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Paramasivam ... Petitioner -Vs1. The District Collector, Salem District, Salem.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Salem District, Salem-1.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer / Sub Collector, Mettur Revenue Division, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District.

4. The Tahsildhar, Mettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District.

5. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildhar, Mettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District.

6. S.Azhagesan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to make UDR corrections with regard to the extent of lands in S.Nos.539/1G and 539/1I of Mallikundam Revenue Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to issue separate patta in the name

of LRs of Pappal for their property in S.No.539/1G to an extent of 19 cents and S.No.539/1I, to an extent of 12 cents, totally 31 cents, situated at Mallikundam Revenue Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District based on the Application of the petitioner dated 02.06.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Jothimanian For R1 to R5 : Mr.C.Jayachandran Government Advocate O RDER This Writ Petition has been filed for direction directing the second respondent to make UDR corrections with regard to the extent of lands in S.Nos.539/1G and 539/1I of Mallikundam Revenue Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to issue separate patta in the name of LRs of Pappal for their property in S.No.539/1G to an extent of 19 cents and S.No.539/1I, to an extent of 12 cents, totally 31 cents, situated at Mallikundam Revenue Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District, based on the Application of the petitioner dated 02.06.2025.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 to 5 and perused the materials available on record.

3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the writ petition, the

second respondent is directed to conduct enquiry on the application of the petitioner dated 02.06.2025, after issuance of notice to the petitioner, 6th respondent and counter parties if any, after giving an opportunity of hearing to them, pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

22.10.2025 Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order mn

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn To

1. The District Collector, Salem District, Salem.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Salem District, Salem-1.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer / Sub Collector, Mettur Revenue Division, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District.

4. The Tahsildhar, Mettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District.

5. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildhar, Mettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District.

22.10.2025