State Bank Of India v. The Professional Couriers

A.No.670 of 2023 and A.No.9250 of 2019 A.No.670 of 2023 and A.No.9250 of 2019 in C.S.Nos.81 & 82 of 2006 C.SARAVANAN, J.

The learned counsel for the D1, D10 and D11 are represented by their counsel. This application has been filed for effecting substituted service of Court notice at the last known address by way of paper publication for effecting service on D2 to D9 and D12, who are the respondent Nos.2 to 9 and 12 in the above applications in A.No.9250 of 2019. A.No.9250 of 2019 has been filed to direct the D10 and D11/respondents herein to furnish security for the suit claim of Rs.1,82,66,218/-. 2.Considering the fact that the relief sought for in A.No.9250 of 2019 is sought for only respondent Nos.10 and 11/defendants who are represented by this Court, there is no point in allowing this application for substituted service of notice through Paper Publication.

3.Considering the above, A.No.670 of 2023 for effecting substituted service of notice through paper publication is declined. However, substituted 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.No.670 of 2023 and A.No.9250 of 2019 service on Court Notice Board and Last Known Residence of the C.SARAVANAN, J.

jas rest of the defendants/respondents alone is permitted to be taken out within a period of two weeks from today.

4.A.No.670 of 2023 is partly allowed. List A.No.9250 of 2019 for enquiry, after two weeks, after service is completed. 09.02.2023 jas A.No.670 of 2023 and A.No.9250 of 2019 in C.S.Nos.81 & 82 of 2006 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis