P.Pichaikaran v. The Joint Registrar Of Coop.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 01.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA P.Pichaikaran

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Joint Registrar of Coop. Societies, Villupuram Region, Villupuram, Villupuram District (Now the Joint Registrar of Coop. Societies, Kallakurichi Region, Near Tollgate, Kallakurichi, Kallakurichi District.) 2.The President Nariyandhal Primary Agricultural Coop. Credit Society, Nariyandhal, Thiruppalapandhal Post, Tirukoilur Taluk, Villupuram District 1/5

(Now the Administrator Nariyandhal Primary Agricultural Coop. Credit Society, Nariyandhal, Thiruppalapandhal Post, Tirukoilur Taluk, Kallakurichi District.) 3.G.Dhandapani

...Respondent

Prayer: Review Petition is filed to review the order passed by this Honourable Court made in W.P. No.27031 of 2014 dated 07.06.2024 For Petitioner :

Mr. C.Prakasam For Respondents :

Mr. S.Ravikumar 1 & 2 Special GP (Co-operative).

O R D E R

The review petition has been filed on the ground that the order does not make a mention about the notional promotion. When the Writ Petition had come up on 07.06.2024 what was submitted was that the petitioner had retired from the service and his retirement benefits had not been paid.

2/5

2. The Writ Petition was not contested on merits and what was prayed was that the petitioner be paid the retirement benefits. Therefore, this Court passed the order in the Writ Petition.

3. The review petition has now been filed on the ground that the interest has not been calculated and his promotion to Clerk has not been taken into consideration. The petitioner's grievance in the Writ Petition was that he was not paid the retirement benefits.

4. Therefore, questioning the calculation of his retirement benefits as if he has been promoted to the post of Clerk cannot be canvassed in the revision petition. As to the issue of interest which is the subject matter of review this Court clearly stated that amounts shall include the interest.

5. The learned counsel for the respondents would submit that all the amounts with interest has been paid.

3/5

6. In case the interest paid is less than an interest that is payable to the petitioner, it is well open to the petitioner to question the same.

7. The Review Application is dismissed. No costs. 01.07.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kan 4/5

P.T. ASHA, J, kan 01.07.2025 5/5