← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/27384/2023granted

Seshammal v. Inspector Of Police

2023-12-07Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.12.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Seshammal W/o. Rajamani ... Petitioner/Accused Vs.

The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Santhavasal Police Station, (Crime No.559 of 2023) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.559 of 2023 on the file of the respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Balaji For Respondent : Mr.R.Kishore Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner seeks bail in Crime No.559 of 2023, registered by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 4(1)(aa) r/w 4(1-A)ii of TNP Act.

2.The petitioner had been remanded to custody on 07.10.2023 with possession of 60 litres of illicit arrack.

3.It is also stated that there are six previous cases pending against the petitioner herein but however, taking into consideration the period of incarceration, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

4.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Polur, Tiruvannamalai District, and on further conditions that: - [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. 2/4

[b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

07.12.2023 ata 3/4

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

ata To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Polur, Tiruvannamalai District 2.The Inspector of Police, Santhavasal Police Station, 3.The Special Prison for Women, Vellore.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

07.12.2023 4/4