← Library
Madras High CourtWP/35082/2022disposed of

Thirumuruga Dinesh v. Director General Of Police

2022-12-28Honourable Mr Justice A.A.Nakkiran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :28.12.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN Thirumuruga Dinesh ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

2.The Additional Director General of Police, (Law and Order) Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

3.The District Collector, Tiruppur District.

4.The Inspector General of Police (West Zone), Race Course Road, Thomas Park, Race Course, Coimbatore - 641 018.

5.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, (West Zone), Race Course Road, Thomas Park, Race Course, Coimbatore - 641 018, Coimbatore District.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or 1/4

direction in the nature of writ, directing the first respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 24.12.2022 for providing adequate police protection to save the life of the petitioner and to discharge his duties without fear as a political activist on payment of necessary charges. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Kalimuthu For Respondents : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 24.12.2022 for providing adequate police protection to save the life of the petitioner and to discharge his duties without fear as a political activist on payment of necessary charges.

2. The case of the petitioner in brief;- The petitioner is a political activist and he is in active political life for more than fifteen years as President of the Youth wing of Shivsena party. Earlier, he was provided with police escort for few days and then the same was withdrawn without any justifiable reasons. Hence, the petitioner was constrained to send a representation on 24.12.2022, seeking police protection 2/4

through RPAD as well as in person. However, there is no communication from the respondents. Hence the writ petition.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the representation of the petitioner dated 24.12.2022 may be considered on merits and appropriate orders may be passed in accordance with law.

4. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to direct the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.12.2022 and dispose of the same, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

5. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

28.12.2022 Index :Yes/No ata/lbm 3/4

A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.

ata/lbm To 1.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

2.The Additional Director General of Police, (Law and Order) Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

3.The District Collector, Tiruppur District.

4.The Inspector General of Police (West Zone), Race Course Road, Thomas Park, Race Course, Coimbatore - 641 018.

5.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, (West Zone), Race Course Road, Thomas Park, Race Course, Coimbatore - 641 018, Coimbatore District.

28.12.2022 4/4