R.Sakthivel v. The Tahsildar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.07.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM R.Sakthivel ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Kurinjipadi, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore District.

2.Singara Padayachi 3.Kamsala Ammal ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to pass orders on the representation dated 10.06.2017 given by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gururaj For R1 : Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government Advocate For R2 & R3 : No appearance

O R D E R

The writ petition has been instituted for directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 10.06.2017 submitted by the petitioner for grant of patta.

2. The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the first respondent made a submission based on the written instruction from the Tahsildar, Kurinjipadi, that the applications submitted by the writ petitioner has already been considered and subsequently the claim for patta was rejected. That being the factum, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken in respect of the grounds raised in this writ petition.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. 04.07.2023 skr Index : Yes

To The Tahsildar, Kurinjipadi, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore District.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

skr 04.07.2023